The High Court of Bombay heard a notice of motion application supported by an affidavit. The court discharged the duty of reading the returned affidavit and stood to rule that no reasons could be extracted from an order made ex-parte.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMW146.13
1
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.146 OF 2013
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1161 OF 2001
Smt.Jayanthi Sitaram Aiyar ....Applicant V/s. The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax ....Respondents
Mr.N.M.Ganguli for the applicant.
None for the respondents.
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR & K.R.SHRIRAM,JJ
DATE : 6th September , 2013.
P.C. :-
1 For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses-(a) & (b). The applicant shall serve the copy of this order upon the respondents.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
(S.J.VAZIFDAR,J)
Smt.Jayanthi Sitaram Aiyar
The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax
S.J.Vazifdar
K.R.Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
