Sandhya Sudhir Mahadik v. Jogeshwari Education Society and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed ex parte due to the absence of the petitioner and her advocate on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp657-12
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.657 OF 2012
Sandhya S. Mahadik ...Petitioner V/s. Jogeshwari Education Society & Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Sagar Batavia i/b Mr.A.G.Kothari for Respondent Nos.1 and 4.
Ms.Anjali Helekar, A.G.P. for the State – Respondent Nos.5, 6 and 8.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR &
K.R. SHRIRAM, JJ. DATE : 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2013.
P.C. :-
1. The petitioner and her advocate were absent on the last
occasion. They are absent today. Hence dismissed.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
1/1
Sandhya S. Mahadik
Jogeshwari Education Society
S.J. VAZIFDAR
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court