The Court granted an extension of two weeks to the applicant for depositing costs of Rs. 10,000/- previously directed. The notice of motion seeking this extension was disposed of in favor of the applicant.
Extension of time to deposit costs of Rs. 10,000/- by two weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 .. 30-NMT-29-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY .
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.29 OF 2012
IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.85 OF 2011
PETITION NO.181 OF 2003
Smt. Savita S. Todankar ... Petitioner V/s.
Sunil S. Todankar ... Respondent
Mr J.K.Jadhav for applicant in notice of motion. None for petitioner.
CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA J. DATED : AUGUST 12, 2013.
P.C.
By this notice of motion taken out by the applicant, the appilcant
seeks extension of time for compliance of the direction given by this Court by
order dated 8th December 2011.
due to unavoidable circumstances. None appeared for the petitioner though
1/2
Asmita
.. 2 .. 30-NMT-29-12
served.
today. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs.
2/2
Asmita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be extended for payment of costs directed by a previous order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Savita S. Todankar
Sunil S. Todankar
R.D. Dhanka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
