Icici Bank Ltd. and 22 Ors. v. Vipul Desai and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment is a one-line order dismissing a chamber summons as withdrawn by the counsel for defendant nos. 1 and 2 without any substantive reasoning.
This judgment is a one-line order dismissing a chamber summons as withdrawn by the counsel for defendant nos. 1 and 2 without any substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/1
10-CHS104.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 104 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3469 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 3057 OF 2010
ICICI Bank Ltd. Provident Fund & Ors.
..... Plaintiffs
VERSUS
Vipul Desai & Ors.
..... Defendants
Dr.Birendra Saraf, a/w. Mr.Mayur Bhojwani, i/b. Manilal Kher Ambalal for the Plaintiffs.
Mr.Karl Shroff, i/b. Mr.Ajay Rao for Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 4.
Mr.Simil Purohit, a/w. Mr.Rohan Cama, Mr.Manish Doshi, i/b. Vimadalal & Co. for Defendant Nos. 5 to 9.
Mr.Omkar Bade, i/b. Jaykar & Partners for Defendant No.3.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.
DATED : 8th AUGUST, 2013
P.C.
Shri Shroff, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant nos. 1 and 2 submits that in view of the Order passed by this Court in Chamber Summons No. 145 of 2011 today, defendant nos. 1 and 2 does not press this Chamber Summons at this stage. Chamber Summons is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]
ICICI Bank Ltd. Provident Fund & Ors.
Vipul Desai & Ors.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court