In a testamentary petition where defendant sought to examine witnesses for document production, the High Court of Mumbai issued witness summons returnable before the Commissioner for evidence recording.
Issue witness summons upon two witnesses returnable before Commissioner on 2 April 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NMS No.25_2012
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.25 OF 2012
IN
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.610 OF 1993
Harish Vithal Kulkarni & Anr.
Harish Vithal Kulkarni & Anr. – Petitioners / Plaintiffs V/s. – Pradeep Mahadeo Sabnis Caveator / Defendant
Mr. Naidu, Adv. for the Petitioners.
Ms. Usha Purohit, Adv. for the Defendant
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 18th March, 2013.
P.C. :
2
NMS No.25_2012
jsn
( ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
Harish Vithal Kulkarni & Anr.
Pradeep Mahadeo Sabnis
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
