Single-judge bench dismissed this writ petition challenging the refusal to discharge petitioners from charges under Sections 498-A, 506, 504, 323 IPC, and Dowry Prohibition Act. Found prima facie case existed.
The writ petition was dismissed as no case for discharge was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) (11) WP 1141/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
WRIT PETITION NO. 1141 OF 2012
Vinod Rajkrishan Kaushik & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Ms. S. R. Padhye for the Petitioners. Mrs. A. A. Mane, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 15th MARCH, 2013.
P.C.
(2) (11) WP 1141/12
complaint under the aforesaid sections which would have to be considered on merits of the trial.
(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging the refusal to discharge petitioners from dowry and cruelty charges is maintainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vinod Rajkrishan Kaushik & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
