A notice of motion moved to allow a late filing of a review petition due to a delay of twenty-four days, which was satisfactorily explained in the supporting affidavit.
The Motion is made absolute allowing the delay of twenty-four days in filing the Review Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA616-25.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.616 OF 2013 IN REVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.27 OF 2013 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (LODG.) NO.35 OF 2013
Central Railway ..Review Petitioner/Appellant. versus Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Nagpur ..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Review Petitioner /Appellant. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Ms. Suchitra Kamble for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
25 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of twenty-four days in filing the Review Petition which has been satisfactorily explained in the affidavit in support of the Motion. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Central Railway
Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Nagpur
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
S.C.GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
