5 In our view, the order of the learned Single Judge does not warrant any interference at this stage. The will, admittedly, has still not been probated. Caveats have been filed by three of the daughters of the deceased who have been excluded from the residential flat at CCI Chambers and the issue as to whether the will has been duly proved will have to be decided by the court in the exercise of its testamentary jurisdiction. At this stage, hence, it would only be appropriate and proper that the estate of the deceased should be protected by an order of injunction. However, we find upon a perusal of prayer clause (a)(v) which has been extracted above, that the learned Single Judge has granted an injunction against any transfer, transaction, and dealing in relating to the flat; the injunction operates against the Sixth Defendant which is the co-operative society. However, the injunction which has been issued by the learned Single Judge is rather broad in its sweep because it would prevent even a bonafide licence agreement being entered into in respect of the residential flat. It would serve no purpose whatsoever in keeping the flat unused and to allow it to deteriorate. Hence, during the course of hearing, we have heard the submissions of the learned Counsel on how the legitimate concerns of the parties can be protected, while preserving the estate. Counsel have explored several alternatives. What we now propose to record and direct will protect the legitimate concerns of both the Appellants and the Respondents. Accordingly, we direct as follows :
