Single judge order admitting Appeal to be placed for admission after satisfactory explanation of delay. No other substantive decision.
Motion made absolute; Appeal to be placed for admission on 30 July 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA531-12.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.531 OF 2013 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.77 OF 2013 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.239 OF 2009
Dilip Venilal Maniar versus Rameshbhai Venilal Maniar (deceased) Madhukanta Ramesh Maniar and others
..Appellant.
..Respondents.
Mr. D.A. Joseph i/b M/s. David and Associates for the Appellant. Mr. Sameer D. Pendse i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
12 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of thirty-six months in filing the Appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. No reply has been filed opposing the Motion. Hence, the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Appeal to be placed for admission on 30 July 2013.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Dilip Venilal Maniar
Rameshbhai Venilal Maniar (deceased)
Madhukanta Ramesh Maniar
D.Y.Chandrachud
S.C.Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
