The appeal was admitted to hear with the delay of forty-two days being satisfactorily explained; the motion is made absolute in terms of the prayer clause. No substantive ruling on merits is provided in this order.
The motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA1441-12.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1441 OF 2012 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.289 OF 2012 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1853 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.1278 OF 2009
Fontasey Engineering Exports Pvt. Ltd. versus Expeditors International (India) Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
None for the Appellant. Mr. Sandip Barve i/b B.K. Barve & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ. 12 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of forty-two days in filing the Appeal which has been satisfactorily explained. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of forty-two days in filing the appeal was satisfactorily explained.
Fontasey Engineering Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Expeditors International (India) Pvt. Ltd.
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
S.C.GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
