Disposed
Atul Vijay Madan v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Bombay HCNMA/478/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.nma.478.13 wp.2398.12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 478 OF 2013 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO. 81 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2398 OF 2012
Atul Vijay Madan ..Applicant In the matter between : Atul Vijay Madan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Alaukik R. Pai i/b Mr.S.J.Khera Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Advocate for Respondent No.1-BMC.
P.C.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support, the Notice of
Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
The Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
[K. R. SHRIRAM, J.] [ S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.]
1 / 1
Shraddha Talekar P.A.
Atul Vijay Madan
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
S.J. VAZIFDAR
K. R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court