This court disposed of a Notice of Motion filed in connection with Writ Petition No.2686 of 2012. The Notice of Motion was allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a) of the affidavit-in-support and was subsequently disposed of.
Notice of Motion allowed in terms of prayer clause-(a) and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMW46.13
1
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.46 OF 2013
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2686 OF 2012
Pradnya Rajesh Mhatre ....Applicant/Petitioner V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr.Bhavesh Parmar i/by Mr.Devmani Shukla & Mr.Vijayprakash Yadav for the petitioner.
Ms.Anjali Helekar AGP for the respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.Vishal R.Ghoshalkar for respondent no.3.
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR & K.R.SHRIRAM,JJ
DATE : 20th September , 2013.
P.C. :-
1 For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support, the
Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause-(a). Notice of Motion disposed of.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
(S.J.VAZIFDAR,J)
2 NMW46.13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Notice of Motion should be allowed in terms of the prayer clause in the affidavit-in-support.
Pradnya Rajesh Mhatre
State of Maharashtra
S.J.VAZIFDAR
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
