Appeal against an order dismissing a suit. The court observed a 34-day delay in filing the appeal but found a satisfactory explanation provided by the appellant. Consequently, the Notice of Motion was made absolute.
Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA354-12.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.354 OF 2013 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.699 OF 2012 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 197 OF 2012
Dia Deb International Inc. versus Krinal Gems
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
None for the Appellant.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
12 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of thirty-four days in filing the Appeal which has been satisfactorily explained. Hence, the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Dia Deb International Inc.
Krinal Gems
D.Y.Chandrachud
S.C.Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
