I. C. I. C. I. Bank Ltd. v. Vivek Seth
Case brief
What is this about?
In default, the Notice of Motion was dismissed as the Applicant and counsel were absent, causing the Appeal to cease on the file.
What the court decided
nma 1130-2012
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1130 OF 2012 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 288 OF 2012 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3057 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 1516 OF 1990
ICICI Bank Limited ..Applicant / Appellant vs. Vivek Seth of Bombay ...Respondent
Mr.N.D. Yelkar for the Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
16 JULY 2013.
P.C. :
The Applicant and its Advocate are absent. The Notice of Motion is, hence, dismissed in default.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
ICICI Bank Limited
- respondent
Vivek Seth
Coram
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court