Letters Patent Appeal No. 216 of 2013 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite the matter being called out twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3007lpa216.13
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.216 OF 2013
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 134 OF 2013
(Shri Durgadas s/o Shankarlal Agrawal vs. Shri Hari s/o Vitthal Tangelapelli)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : JULY 30, 2013
The letters patent appeal is called out twice. None appears for the appellant. Hence, letters patent appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Durgadas s/o Shankarlal Agrawal
Hari s/o Vitthal Tangelapelli
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
