Dismissed
Madhukar Krushnarao Sawarkar and Another v. Rajkumar Shrivallabh Mundhada and Others
Bombay HCLPA/138/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 lpa138.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.138/2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1253/2013 (D)
Shri Madhukar Krushnarao Sawarkar and another
...Versus...
Shri Rajkumar Shrivallabh Mundhada and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's ordersMs Ritu P. Jog, Adv. for appellants. Mr. S.S. Alaspurkar, Adv. for respondents no.1 and 2. Mr. G.I. Dipwani, Adv. for respondent no.3.CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 26.07.2013
No case is made out for interference in
the concurrent orders passed by the learned trial
Judge and which is affirmed by the learned Single
Judge. Letters patent appeal is, therefore,
rejected.
JUDGEJUDGE
Tambaskar.
Shri Madhukar Krushnarao Sawarkar and another
Shri Rajkumar Shrivallabh Mundrada and others
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court