A brief order condoning delay in an application seeking a stay or quashing order under LPA and Writ Petition. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the application primarily on the applicant's stated grounds despite opposition from respondent No.4.
Condonation of delay in filing the application is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caz200-13.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application (Z) No. 200 of 2013
in
LPA St. No.5173_/2013. In W.P. No. 5253/2012.
Arun Surajdin Jaiswal and others.
Vrs.
Additional Commissioner and others.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's order
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. A.R. Ingole, counsel for applicants.
Mr. Arun Gawande, counsel for respondent n. 5.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 25th July, 2013
This is an application for condonation of delay. The application is vehemently opposed by the respondent No.4. However, for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned.
Post the appeal for hearing on 1st of August, 2013.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Arun Surajdin Jaiswal and others
Additional Commissioner and others
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
