The petitioner moved to withdraw the pending Company Petition after the respondent paid the claim in a Summary Suit. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP92-13.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 92 OF 2013.
Rajkumar M.Bajaj. .. Petitioner Vs Sachinam Travels Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Ms.Kavita Lalwani, for petitioner. Mr.Ajay Sethi, for respondent.
CORAM: N.M.JAMDAR, J. Wednesday 7 August, 2013
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that since claim made in the petition has been paid by the respondent in the Summary Suit, she has instruction to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Rajkumar M.Bajaj
Sachinam Travels Pvt. Ltd.
N.M.Jamd
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
