High Court of Bombay found the writ petition infructuous as the impugned interim order had been superseded by a final order from the City Civil Court and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-4453.13.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4453 OF 2013 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1276 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1277 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4453 OF 2013
Probodh K. Mehta
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Charuben K. Mehta .. Respondent
Mr. Prateek Seksaria a/w Mr. Ashish Gatagat i/by M/s. Vidhii Partners for the petitioner.
Mr. Karl Tamboly a/w Mr. D. Vyas a/w Mr. Abhishek Prabhu for the respondent.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 6 AUGUST 2013
P.C. :
. This petition challenges an interim order passed by the City Civil Court in the proceedings pending before it. It is informed that the City Civil Court has now passed a final order on 20 July 2013 and the City Civil Court has stayed the operation of its own order till 10 August 2013.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
Probodh K. Mehta
Charuben K. Mehta
N.M. JAMANDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
