Petitioner sought withdrawal of Company Petitions 59 and 60 of 2013 claiming settlement. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-59.13 a.w 60.13.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.59 OF 2013
Arjun s/o Sanjay Sahu .. Petitioner Vs. M/s. HDIL Leisures (P) Ltd. .. Respondent
WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.60 OF 2013
Arjun s/o Sanjay Sahu .. Petitioner Vs. M/s.Guruashish Constructions Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent ---
Mr. Shyam Dewani i/by Mr. Satishkumar Chettiyar for the petitioner. Mr. Arjun Sanjay Sahu, petitioner in-person present.
Mr. Rajesh Shah a/w Mr. Sanmish Gala i/by M/s. Markand Gandhi for the respondent.
Mr. R. Dayal, Authorised signatory for the respondent-company.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 29 AUGUST 2013
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions as according to the learned counsel for the petitioner dispute is settled between the parties.
2. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
Arjun s/o Sanjay Sahu
M/s. HDIL Leisures (P) Ltd.
M/s.Guruashish Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
