The Court disposed of a company petition and associated applications based on the parties' mutual consent. The respondent's applications were withdrawn and dismissed as such.
The company petition was disposed of in terms of consent terms; company applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-61.13.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.61 OF 2013 with COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.303 OF 2013 with COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.320 OF 2013
Arjun s/o Sanjay Sahu
.. Petitioner
Vs. M/s.Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Shyam Dewani i/by Mr. Satishkumar Chettiyar for the petitioner. Mr. Arjun Sanjay Sahu, petitioner in-person present. Mr. Rajesh Shah a/w Mr. Sanmish Gala i/by M/s. Markand Gandhi for the respondent.
Mr. R. Dayal, Authorised signatory for the respondent-company.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 29 AUGUST 2013
P.C. :
. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the parties have resolved the dispute amicably and have executed the consent terms. The learned Counsel state that the consent terms are signed by all concerned and they pray that the petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
ppn 2 cp-61.13.doc counsel for the applicant in company applications seeks leave to withdraw the company applications.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
Arjun s/o Sanjay Sahu
M/s.Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd.
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
