Petitioner abandoned the contempt petition via counsel stating the impugned order was already implemented. The High Court of Gujarat dismissed the petition without costs.
Contempt Petition dismissed without orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp226.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 226 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1608 OF 2011
(Sunanda d/p. Prabhakar Pedgaonkar Vs. Sukhdeo s/o. Dadarao Sanap & Ors.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda |
Court's or Judge's orders |
|---|---|
of Coram,appearances, Court's |
|
orders or directions and |
CORAM :M.T. JOSHI,J. |
Registrar's orders |
DATED :27.09.2013 |
Mr.Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr.T.M. Gaikwad h/f. Mr. U.B. Bondar,
Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. M.M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for
respondent No.3.
1.Learned Counsel for the
petitioner on instructions from the
petitioner submits that the petitioner
does not want to proceed with the
Contempt Petition as the order is
already implemented by the concerned
respondents. In the circumstances, it
would not be expedient to proceed with
the Contempt Petition.
2 cp226.13 2. The Contempt Petition is dismissed without any order as to costs.
[M.T. JOSHI,J.] snk /2013/SEP13/cp226.13
Sunanda d/p. Prabhakar Pedgaonkar
Sukhdeo s/o. Dadarao Sanap
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court