Petitioner filed a company petition against the Respondent. The parties amicably resolved their dispute via signed consent terms. The High Court took the terms on record and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Petition disposed of in terms of signed consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP17-13.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 17 OF 2013.
M/s.Venjara E. Salemohamed & Son .. Petitioner Vs
M/s Orbit Corporation Limited. .. Respondent
Mr.DharmaPal Dave a/w Ms Manasvi Tilwani a/w Mr.N.C.Parekh i/b Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co., for petitioner.
Ms.Sheetal Bhusane i/b Ms Veenu Khatri, for respondent. Mr.Abdul S. Jakbani, C.A of petitioner, present. Mr.Rajesh Shah, Chief Operating Officer of respondent, present.
CORAM: N.M.JAMDAR, J. Thursday 5 September, 2013
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and arrived at consent terms which have been signed by all concerned. The learned counsel pray that the consent terms be taken on record and the petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Accordingly, the consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X'. The undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted.
The petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
M/s. Venjara E. Salemohamed & Son
M/s Orbit Corporation Limited
N.M.JAMDAC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
