Contempt petition disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition established as the court did not engage in adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp159.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 159 OF 2012
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 715 OF 2008
[ Smt. Tulsabai w/o Tukaram Wakchaure vs. Karbnhari Mukta Dhage died LRs. Laxman Karbhhari Dhage & Ors.]
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s
orders
Mr. R.D. Bhalerao, Advocate for the
petitioner.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J.
DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2013
PER COURT :
. The contempt petition is disposed of,
as withdrawn.
[S.S. SHINDE, J.]
sut/Feb13
Smt. Tulsabai w/o Tukaram Wakchaure
Laxman Karbhhari Dhage & Ors.
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court