In this contempt petition, the learned A.G.P. for the State stated that the order of which disobedience had been alleged was complied with. Consequently, the court disposed of the contempt petition and discharged the notice.
Contempt petition disposed of; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp137.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.137 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9239 OF 2011
[Parivartan Magaswargiya Audyogic Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit vs. Mr. Dinesh Waghmare. ]
Office Notes, OfficeMemoranda of Coram, |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
appearances, Court’sorders or directionsand Registrar’sorders |
||||
None forMr. S.D. |
theKald |
petitate, |
ioner.AGP for R/State. |
|
CORDAT |
AM : S.S. SHINDE, J.E : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2013 |
|||
PER COUR |
T : |
|||
. Wh |
en |
the |
matter called out, none |
|
appears |
for |
the p |
etitioner. Learned A.G.P. |
|
appearin |
g fo |
r the |
State, on instructions, |
|
makes a |
stat |
ement |
that, the order of which |
|
disobedi |
ence |
has |
been alleged in this |
|
contempt |
peti |
tion, |
has been complied with. |
|
The cont |
empt |
peti |
tion stands disposed of. |
|
Notice s |
tands |
disc |
harged. |
|
[S.S. SHINDE, J.] |
sut/Feb13
Parivartan Magaswargiya Audyogic Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit
Mr. Dinesh Waghmare
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court