This High Court bench dismissed a contempt petition filed by a pensioner alleging failure to pay pension. The court found that affidavits confirmed the payment of both arrears and regular pension, thus finding no basis for the petition.
The contempt petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp10.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2832 OF 2003
(Smt. Renukabai w/o. Suryabhan Deogare Vs. The State of Maharashtra
& Anr.)
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : M.T. JOSHI,J.
Registrar's ordersDATED : 24.09.2013
None for the petitioner.
Mr.V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for respondent/
State.
1.None for the petitioner.
Perused affidavit filed by Mr. Shrikant
Deshpande, Secretary to the Government
of Maharashtra, General Administration
Department. Para Nos.5,6&7 of affidavit
-in-reply make it clear that entire
arrears of pension are paid as well as
pension is also being paid regularly
even till date of filing of present
contempt petition and thereafter, to
the petitioner.
2 cp10.13
2.In this view of the matter,
nothing survives in the present
petition. The contempt petition stands
dismissed.
[M.T. JOSHI,J.]
snk /2013/SEP13/cp10.13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt petition survives given that the arrears of pension and regular pension have been paid.
Renukabai w/o. Suryabhan Deogare
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court