Allowed an amendment application in Writ Petition No. 4764/2012, holding that the change did not alter the writ's nature but was necessary to decide the controversy. Ordered the amendment within one week.
Amendment application allowed; amendment to be carried out within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP4764-12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4764/2012
(SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICERS, Z.P. BULDANA VERSUS DIVISIONAL SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER & OTHERS)
and Registrar's orders
Shri S.M. Ukey, counsel for the petitioner.
Shri N.S. Khubalkar, A.G.P. for the R-1. Shri N.R. Saboo, counsel for the R-2.
Shri S.S. Khandekar h/f Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the R-3..
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 3, 2013.
Stand over to 17.04.2013 for admission.
C.A.W. NO. 599/2013 .
Heard. Perused the contents of the application.
Though the amendment application is strongly opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent no.3, the prayer made in the amendment application is granted as the proposed amendment does not change the nature of the writ petition and is necessary for effectively and completely deciding the controversy between the parties. The amendment application is allowed.
Necessary amendment should be carried out within
a period of one week.
The civil application is disposed of.
JUDGE
APTE
Social Welfare Officers, Z.P. Buldana
Divisional Social Welfare Officer
Other
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
