Permitting the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 752 of 2013 and disposing of the petition accordingly without resolving substantive points.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp752-13.order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 752 of 2013 Satish Hansraj Patel and others
Vs.
Subhash Kanhaiyalal Bakliwal and another.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri V.K. Paliwal, counsel for petitioenrs.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.
DATE : 1 st April, 2013.
Shri Paliwal, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the petitioners are desirous of availing the appropriate remedy and are, therefore, not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is granted. Writ petition is disposed of
as withdrawn.
All points in the petition are kept open.
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Satish Hansraj Patel and others
Subhash Kanhaiyalal Bakliwal and another
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
