Allowed

M/S Bajaj Alluminium Industries, through Its Partner, Smt. Jaya Purshottam Bajaj v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Commerce and Industrial Affairs and 3 Ot

Bombay HC20 Feb 2013CAW/458/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench allowed an application for amendment of Writ Petition No. 5801 of 2012, which was not yet admitted, and directed the petitioner to submit the amended copy.

What did the court decide?

Application for amendment allowed; petitioner directed to supply amended copy within four days.

M/S Bajaj Alluminium Industries, through Its… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application [CAW] No. 458 of 2013 IN

¶3

Writ Petition No. 5801 of 2012
[M/s. Bajaj Almunium Industries Vs. State of Mah. & others]

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶5

Mr. C.B. Dharmadhikari, Adv., for the petitioner.
Mrs. Deshmukh, AGP for respondents.

¶6

CORAM: A.P. LAVANDE AND
A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.

¶7

DATE : 20th February, 2013.

¶8

Heard Mr. Dharmadhikari, learned counsel
for the applicant-petitioner and Mrs. Deshmukh,
learned AGP for respondents.

¶9

This is an application for amendment of
the Writ Petition, which has not yet been
admitted. Hence the application is allowed.
Amendment be carried out within a period of
four days. Petitioner to supply amended copy
of the petition to the learned AGP.

¶10

¶11

Reply, if any, on behalf of the
respondents be filed within two weeks.

¶12

Stand over to 13th March, 2013.

¶13

JudgeJudge

¶14

|Hedau|

M/S Bajaj Alluminium Industries, through Its Partner, Smt. Jaya Purshottam Bajaj v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Commerce and Industrial Affairs and 3 Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Bajaj Alluminium Industries, through Its Partner, Smt. Jaya Purshottam Bajaj v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Commerce and Industrial Affairs and 3 Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Ramesh Warulkar and One Another Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso, Ps Tamgaon

Sk. Rafique S/O Sk. Hussain ( in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur and Anr.

Pramod S/O Girmaji Dhande Vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Pulgaon and Another

Shri Gorakshan Sanstha through Its Secretary Shri R H Nawander, Amravati and Others Vs Amravati Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner and Others

Sheela Madhukar Gudadhe and Anor. Vs State of Mah. Thru. Secty. and 10 Ors.

Hanuman Mahadeo Zade (in Jail) Vs the State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Wani