This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/3
CAW2219.13)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2219 OF 2013
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5295 OF 2013
Shivaji University …. Applicant.
In the matter of
Shriram Education Society ….Original Petitioner.
V/s
State of Maharashtra & Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Amit Borkar for the Applicant/Original Respondent No.3.
Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Counsel i/b Niranjan Shimpi for Original Petitioner.
Mr. Sameer Patil, AGP for the State.
Mr. Uday Warunjikar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & K.R. SHRIRAM, JJ.
DATE: 5th September, 2013 (In Chamber at 2.35 P.M.)
2/3
CAW2219.13)
P.C.:-
“4.........The Petitioner may comply with the conditions and thereafter make a representation to Respondent No.3 and if such a representation is made, the same may be heard and decided on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible........”
3/3
CAW2219.13)
4 In this view of the matter, we do not think it necessary to give any further clarification of the said observations made by us in the said order. It is obvious that we had permitted the Petitioner to apply for continuation of affiliation after complying with the conditions. It is needless to mention that it is open for the Applicant to consider the representation on merits and in accordance with law.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
B.D. Pandit, PS
Shivaji University
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
