The court allowed Civil Application No. 88 of 2013 (CRS 4665 of 2013) condoning a delay of 42 days, as the applicant satisfactorily explained the delay and no reply was filed opposing it.
Civil Application allowed with no order as to costs for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 CAC/88/2013
Tapadia RR / B.41
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2013
IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 4665 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the Applicants. Mr. Anil Khopde i/b Utangle & Co, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 13/09/2013 PC: 1. Heard Mr.Khopde, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 42 days caused in filing the C.R.A. No reply is filed opposing the application. For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that the applicants have satisfactorily explained the delay. Hence, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.
(R.G.KETKAR,J.)
R.G.Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
