The bench dismissed two civil appeals in the writ jurisdiction concerning interim relief. The court disposed of both applications after hearing both sides.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca10091-09
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10091 OF 2009 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 86 OF 2007
(Sakharam Wasaram Pawar Vs. Sk. Abdullah Sk.
Muhammad Saheb and others)
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7043 OF 2007 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 96 OF 2007
(Shaikh Abdullah Shaikh Mohammadsaheb Munshi and
others Vs. Zimmabai Sakharam Pawar and others)
.....
Mr. Y.M. Khan, advocate for the applicants in C.A.
No. 10091/2009 and for respondent No. 1 in C.A.
No. 7043/2007.
Mr. S.V. Chillarge, advocate for the applicants in
C.A. No. 7043/2007.
Mr. Sandesh Hange, advocate holding for Mr. R.N.
Dhorde, advocate for respondents in C.A. No. 10091/2009.
.....
CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 26th September, 2013
PER COURT :
1. Heard both sides.
2.The interim direction to continue till the
ca10091-09
(2)
disposal of the Appeals. Both the applications are
accordingly disposed of.
[ M.T. JOSHI ]
JUDGE
npj/ca10091-09
Sakharam Wasaram Pawar
Sk. Abdullah Sk. Muhammad Saheb
Shaikh Abdullah Shaikh Mohammadsaheb Munshi
Zimmabai Sakharam Pawar
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court