This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Jalgaon
Civil Application No. 5966 of 2011 (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 192 of 2011)
(Manoj s/o. Dayaram Choudhari Vs.
Sunil s/o. Supadu Mahajan & 2 others)
Appearances : Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. B.E. Yawalkar, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. S.P. Shah, Advocate, for respondent no.1.
Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate, for respondent no.2.
Mr. S.K. Tambe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.3.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER 2013
COURT'S ORDER :
In view of disposal of Letters Patent Appeal No. 192 of 2011, the Civil Application does not survive. Accordingly, the Civil Application is disposed of.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE JUDGE
bgp/ca5966
Manoj s/o. Dayaram Choudhari
Sunil s/o. Supadu Mahajan
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
