The High Court at Aurangabad allowed and disposed of Civil Application No. 2712 of 2013, dated 23.1.2013, granting the prayer clause 'B'.
Allowed the prayer clause 'B' and disposed of the civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca st 2712.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2712 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2013
Kashinath S/o Wamanrao Anerao .. Applicant Versus 1. Sakharam S/o Wamanrao Anerao Died through L.Rs. 1A Shashikala W/o Sakharam Anerao and others .. Respondents
Shri Shivaji K. Naikwade, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri Mahesh P. Kale, Advocate h/f Shri G. V. Sukale, Advocate for Respondents.
Shri V. B. Ghatage, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 23RD JANUARY, 2013.
PER COURT :
. Heard. Shri Kale, the learned counsel appears for the proposed legal representatives. The civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”. The civil application is disposed of.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Jan. 13
Kashinath S/o Wamanrao Anerao
Shashikala W/o Sakharam Anerao
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
