The High Court of Judicature at Bombay rejected an application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted previously. The Court held that as a charge-sheet had been filed and the investigation was complete, there was no point in interfering at that instance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BA-719.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 719 OF 2011
PRIYANKA PURANDER BAGERA
.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
None for the applicant Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP for the State Mr. Sagar Kasar, Advocate for R. No. 2.
CORAM:-ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 17/06/2013
P.C.
None appears for the applicant, when called out.
1/2
2
BA-719.11
at this instance of time. This is particularly so, because the applicant has chosen to remain present through his counsel and make submissions to support his contentions.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
md.saleem
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should cancel anticipatory bail already granted to the accused at the stage of charge-sheet filing.
Priyanka Purander Bagera
State of Maharashtra
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
