This court disposed of a bail application rejected quia minor tanus non presentiam cum. No oral submissions were heard. Prima facie case exists. Application rejected.
Application rejected; applicant not released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 (4)BA-194-13
Tilak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2013
Anil Phulchand Dhiwar ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
None for the applicant.
Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATED : JUNE 14, 2013
P.C.
2 Under the circumstances, application is being decided after going through the same, the annexures thereto, and after hearing the learned APP.
4 The learned counsel for the applicant has not chosen to remain present, and make oral submissions in support of the application.
2/2 (4)BA-194-13
5 Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail.
6 Application is rejected.
( ABHAY M.THIPSAY,J )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is to be released on bail.
Anil Phulchand Dhiwar
The State of Maharashtra
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
