Application to recall dismissal of writ petition No.1498 of 2011 was dismissed. The court held that orders could not be reopened based on Section 362 Cr.P.C., without engaging with submissions.
Application for recall of dismissal of writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vrd 1 APPW89/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1498 OF 2012
Mrs Pallavi A. Parab and others ...Applicants
v/s
The State of Maharashtra and ors. ...Respondents
Mr Vikram R. Chavan for Applicants.
None for Respondents.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED : 12TH AUGUST 2013.
P.C.:-
1.Heard. Dismissal of writ petition No.1498
of 2011, after hearing respective counsel, on 9th
June 2011 is sought to be recalled.
2.Without touching to the submissions of the
learned counsel for applicants that certain legal
aspects were not pointed, the fact remains in the
light of bar under section 362 Cr.P.C., the orders
of this Court cannot be reopened. Criminal
vrd 2 APPW89/12
application is dismissed.
( K.U. CHANDIWAL J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether dismissal of writ petition can be recalled under Section 362 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs Pallavi A. Parab and others
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
K.U. Chandiwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court