This High Court allowed criminal application No.1262 of 2004 to quash an order subjecting the applicant to intrusive forensic tests, following the Supreme Court's decision in Arun Gulab Gawli.
The order questioned in the present application has been quashed and criminal application No.1262 of 2004 is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vrd 1 APPLN1262/04
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1262 OF 2004
Shri Sachin H. Vaje ...Applicant
v/s
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents
Mr S.V. Marwadi for Applicant.
Mr A.R. Patil, APP for Respondents.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED : 12TH AUGUST 2013.
P.C.:-
1.Heard. In the light of the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.987
of 2010 in the matter of Arun Gulab Gawli v/s State
of Maharashtra, the order questioned in the present
application of subjecting applicant to Narco
Analysis Test (Truth Serum Test), Lie Detector Test
(Polygraph Test) and Brain Mapping Test (P-300 Test)
has been quashed by Supreme Court and consequently
criminal application No.1262 of 2004 is allowed.
( K.U. CHANDIWAL J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arun Gulab Gawli v/s State of MaharashtraFollowed¶10
Criminal Appeal No.987 of 2010 in the matter of Arun Gulab Gawli v/s State of Maharashtra
Sachin H. Vaje
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court