The Single Judge examined a delay of 79 days in filing a criminal appeal against a conviction. Finding the reasons assigned sufficient, the court condoned the delay upon payment of costs and allowed the application.
Application allowed; delay of 79 days condoned on costs of Rs.500/-; notice issued in revision application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vrd 1 APPR78/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.78 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.91 OF 2013
Gajanan Bapu Jadhav and ors.
v/s
The State of Maharashtra
...Applicants
...Respondents
Mr Rupesh Zade i/b Mr Shailesh Chavan for
Applicants.
Mr A.R. Patil, APP for Respondents.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED : 12TH JULY 2013.
P.C.:-
1.Heard. Notice. The learned APP accepts
service for State. There is delay of 79 days in
filing the appeal. Considering the reasons
assigned, delay being sufficiently explained, it is
condoned on costs of Rs.500/-. Application is
allowed. Notice in the revision application. The
learned APP accepts service for State. S.O. to 6th
August 2013. The learned APP will also inform
vrd 2 APPR78/13
about the progress in on-going sessions case.
Application is allowed.
( K.U. CHANDIWAL J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 79 days in filing the appeal is sufficiently explained and condonable.
Gajanan Bapu Jadhav and ors.
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court