Responding to an application for time to deposit costs, the High Court adjourned the criminal revision application for hearing, warning that failure to comply may result in dismissal without back reference.
Adjournment of the revision application for hearing on 31st July 2013 pending deposit of costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vrd 1 APPR137/11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.137 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2010
M/s Mandlik Trading Co.
M/s Mandlik Trading Co. ...Applicants
v/s
State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents
Mr Amey Deshpande i/b Mr J.D. Khairnar for
Applicants.
Mr D.R. More, APP for Respondent No.1.
Mr Sachin Gite i/b Mr M.S. Karnik for Respondent
No.2.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED : 12TH JULY 2013.
P.C.:-
1.Cost of Rs.1,000/- as directed on 15th April
2011 is not yet deposited. The learned counsel for
applicants seeks time to deposit the same within a
week. Keep the revision application for hearing on
31st July 2013. Failure to deposit costs to face
dismissal without back reference to the Court.
( K.U. CHANDIWAL J.)
M/s Mandlik Trading Co.
State of Maharashtra
K. U. Chandiwali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court