Single judge order condoning a 280-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application as sufficiently explained, thereby allowing the application and staying proceedings pending further orders.
Delay of 280 days condoned; Criminal Revision Application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1
37-appr49.13.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2013
WITH
REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 62 OF 2013
Narendra Dhanpal Patil ....Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents.
Ms. Gulestan M. Dubhash i/by Ganesh Gole for the Applicant. Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for Respondent No.1. Mr. Anand Landge i/by Tejpal S. Ingale for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 17 JULY 2013
P.C.:
Heard.
2 There is delay of 280 days in preferring the Criminal Revision Application. Delay is sufficiently explained, and not deliberately caused. Delay is condoned. The Application is allowed.
3 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents accepts service in Revision with stay Application. Stand over to 21 August 2013.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 280 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application is condonable.
Narendra Dhanpal Patil
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. Chandiwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
