Disposed
Sangita Sudhakar Shendge v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/646/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application withdrawn; disposed of as such without elaboration in a one-line order.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.646 OF 2013
Sangita Sudhakar Shendge
..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
..Respondent
Mr S.J.Salgare, Advocate for applicant Mr D.V.Tele, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : P.D. KODE, J.
DATE : 21st February 2013
PER COURT :
The learned Counsel for the applicant, after arguing the matter for some time, has stated that he wants to withdraw the application.
The application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( P.D. KODE, J.)
vvr/646.13criappln
Sangita Sudhakar Shendge
The State of Maharashtra
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court