High Court at Aurangabad rejected an application for anticipatory bail under Sections 307, 498-A IPC. The court noted neighbour statements placed the applicants at the scene of a burn injury incident, holding it unfit for bail.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 appln6448-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6448 OF 2013
... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
... Respondents
Mr. J. M. Murkute, for the applicant Mr. A. S. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 20th December, 2013
PER COURT :
sides are heard and this court has perused the papers of investigation.
1/2
the deceased sustained burn injuries. The dying declaration was recorded on the same day. She has disclosed that both the applicants held her when the others had set fire to her.
it cannot be said thtthe applicants are falsely implicated. Therefore the application is rejected.
( T. V. NALAWADE J. )
JPC
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given the evidence of the applicants' presence at the crime scene.
Whether the existence of neighbour statements corroborating presence makes this unsuitable for anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhondiram s/o Santoba Nagargoje
Revatibai w/o Dhondiram Nagarjoge
The State of Maharashtra and another
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
