Application held superfluous as Section 301 CrPC does not require court permission. Application stands filed to preserve formality.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri.Appln630.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 630 OF 2013
(Bharatabai Keshavrao Bhalerao V/s Pravin Narayan Kadam and others)
_________________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office |
Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's |
orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders
directions and |
Registrar's orders |
_________________________________________________________________________________
Mr. A.K. Bhosale, advocate for applicant
Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for Respondent/State.
CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. Date : 25th February, 2013.
P.C. :
2. Application stands filed.
( P.D. KODE, J. )
sga/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharatabai Keshavrao Bhalerao
Pravin Narayan Kadam
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court