Dismissed

Hemant Shrawan Waghmare and Ors. v. the State of Mah

Bombay HC1 Jan 2013APPLN/5818/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed withdrawal of multiple criminal applications seeking anticipatory bail. Applicants were permitted to withdraw with liberty, granted interim protection from arrest, and directed to surrender by January 15, 2013.

What did the court decide?

Applications allowed to withdraw with liberty; interim protection from arrest granted; directed to surrender by 15.1.2013.

Hemant Shrawan Waghmare and Ors. Vs the State of Mah — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

appln.5818.12 ors

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

¶5

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

¶6

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

Court’s or Judge’s orders

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, VJ. Registrar’s orders DATE : 01st January, 2013.

¶9

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.:5818 OF 2012

¶10

¶11

Hemant Shrawan Waghmare And Ors

¶12

VERSUS

¶13

The State Of Maharashtra

¶14

WITH

¶15

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.:5819 OF 2012

¶16

¶17

Raosaheb Yadav Auti And Ors

¶18

VERSUS

¶19

The State Of Maharashtra

¶20

¶21

WITH

¶22

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.:5852 OF 2012

¶23

¶24

Sopan Jagannath Raut And Ors

¶25

VERSUS

¶26

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr

¶27

¶28

AND

¶29

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.:1 OF 2013

¶30

¶31

Vitthal Rambhau Kshirsagar

¶32

VERSUS

¶33

The State Of Maharashtra

appln.5818.12 ors

Mr. Mahesh R. Sonawane, Advocate h/f Mr. S.R.Bagal, Advocate for the Applicants in Criminal Application No.5852 of 2012.

¶38

Mr. Kakde Yuvraj V., Advocate for the Applicants in rest of the Criminal Applications.

¶39

Mr. G.R.Ingole, APP for the Respondent / State.

¶40

¶41

P.C.

¶42

. This is a bunch of applications filed by the persons who are accused in Crime No.398 of 2012 dated 7th December, 2012 registered with Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar alongwith other accused persons, who had approached this Court under Criminal Application No.5780 of 2012 making similar prayer as in the present case for anticipatory bail. By a reasoned order dated 21st December, 2012 the criminal application has been disposed of letting the Applicants in Criminal Application No.5780 of 2012 to withdraw the same with liberty. It is contended that the Applicants therein have also been accused of similar offences as the present Applicants and in the very same FIR.

¶43

2 This position has not been disputed by the learned AGP appearing for the Respondent – State. Having regard to this position, for the very same reasons as contained in the order dated 21st December, 2012 in Criminal Application No.5780 of 2012, the present Applicants are

¶44

¶45

appln.5818.12 ors

¶46

allowed to withdraw the present applications with liberty and are disposed of as such. Accordingly, all the Applicants in the present applications may surrender before the Competent Authority – either the Investigating Officer or the Concerned Court on or before 15th January, 2013. The interim protection is accordingly granted to the them in respect of arrest of these Applicants. All the Applicants shall attend the Investigating Officer as and when called by him.

¶47

3 It may be noted here that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and as such the observations made by the learned Sessions Judge-4, Ahmednagar in its order dated 10th December, 2012 in paragraph No.9 while dismissing the applications filed by the other applicants, whose applications are disposed of by this Court as withdrawn, shall not be treated as in any way disturbed by this order.

¶48

4 The criminal applications are disposed of on above terms.

¶49

5 Parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order.

¶50

[ SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, VJ ]

¶51

ndm

Hemant Shrawan Waghmare and Ors. v. the State of Mah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Shrawan Waghmare and Ors. v. the State of Mah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Ramrao Muley Vs a P M C Latur and Anr.

Dr.Atul Babnrao Jagtap Deceased Th Lrs Sneha Atul Jagtap and Ors. Vs Dhule Charitable Society and Anr.

The Ex Engineer Latur Minor Irrigation Division Latur and Ors. Vs the General Secretary Osmanababad District PWD and Irrigation Labour Union and Ors.

Usha Dattatraya Sane Vs the State of Mah through It Secretary Rural Dev Dept and Ors.

Bapu Yadav Rohakale and Anr. Vs the State of Mah

The Executive Engineer N M C Division Vaijapur Vs the State of Mah and Ors.