Criminal Application in a cheque dishonour case. The court observed it was a case of 'oath against oath' and held the impugned judgment was not perverse, dismissing the application for interference.
Application dismissed; High Court refused interference with the impugned judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cra appln 5347-2003
Smt
(hand written order)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5347 OF 2003
Santoshkumar Vishwakarma .. Applicant. Vs. Mangesh Thange and anr. .. Respondents.
S/Shri Ajinkya Deshmukh i/by Pratap Patil, for the Applicant. Shri Pawan P. Mali, for the Respondent No.1.
Shri. V.B. Konde Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 11TH OCTOBER, 2013.
1/2
Cra appln 5347-2003
(A. H. JOSHI, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the high court should interfere with the trial court's judgment in a cheque dishonour case where the complaint was based on an oath against oath.
Santoshkumar Vishwakarma
Mangesh Thange
A. H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
