The court disposed of a bail application by relying on a prior judgment on anticipatory bail passed on the same date by a judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, noting the applicant was present in person while the State was represented by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S
appp545.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.545 OF 2013 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.941 OF 2013
Rizwan Merchant .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr. Rizwan Merchant, applicant in person present. Mr. A. S. Gadhkari and Ms. A. A. Mane APP for the State.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 11TH OCTOBER, 2013.
(A. H. JOSHI, J.)
1/1
Rizwan Merchant
State of Maharashtra
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
