Allowed
Manisha Ashok Shinde v. Vinod Roopsing Kadam and Another
Bombay HCAPPLN/5200/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5200 OF 2013
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4816/2013
( Manisha w/o Ashok Shinde Vs. Vinod Rupsing Kadam & Anr.)
Office Notes, office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or Directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mr.NB Narwade, Advocate for applicant/s (orig. Complainant) Mr.VR Dhorde, Advocate for applicant;
Mr.KG Patil, APP for State.
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL J
DATE :8 th OCTOBER, 2013.
1) HeardMr.Dhorde,learnedCounselfor
applicant/accused. Mr.Narwade appears for
originalcomplainantbyintervention
application being Criminal Application No.
5200/2013. Considering the reasons assigned
and grounds, the application for intervention
allowed.
2) The applicant – Vinod and the investigator in the matter to remain present before this court on the adjourned date.3) S.O. 11th October, 2013.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL)
JUDGE
bdv/
Manisha w/o Ashok Shinde
Vinod Rupsing Kadam
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court