Santosh Balabhau Bajade v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What did the court decide?
Criminal Application No. 4917 of 2013 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
4917-13
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4917 OF 2013
SANTOSH BALABHAU BAJADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dhamangaonkar Ramesh S. APP for Respondent: Mr. K. G. Patil.
***
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL AND A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ. DATED: 21st OCTOBER, 2013
PER COURT:
1. Heard.
2. Perused the record.
3. Petitioner is technical service
provider for Jalna for preparing estimates.
Such estimates work more than Rs.10 Cror.
He asserted his fees is fixed at 2% and
received Rs.18,15,000/. The F.I.R. dated
23rd July, 2013 illustrate he did not
extend such expertise as a technical
service provider. At this stage, no
interference in F.I.R. No.69 of 2013 is
-:(2):-
4917-13
called for.
4. Criminal Application dismissed.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.] [K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.]
Dt.21/10/2013
ans/491713
Santosh Balabahu Bajade
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. Chandiwala
A.I. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court