The High Court condoned a delay of 22 days in filing a criminal appeal as sufficiently explained, allowing and disposing of the criminal application.
Condonation of delay of 22 days; criminal application allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran4457.13
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4457 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO. 302 OF 2013
Gajendra Kishan Dhage and Anr ...Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. A.R. Sayeed h/f Mr. S.P. Brahme, advocate for the applicants Mrs. R.K. Ladda, A.P.P. for respondent-State
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
the delay of 22 days is sufficiently explained, the same is condoned.
The criminal application is allowed and disposed of.
rlj/
cran4457.13
-2-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 22 days in filing the criminal appeal is sufficiently explained for condonation.
Gajendra Kishan Dhage and Anr
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. CHANDIWAL
A. I. S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
